Log In
Sign Up and Get Started Blogging!
JoeUser is completely free to use! By Signing Up on JoeUser, you can create your own blog and participate on the blogs of others!
a blog about nothing....mostly
a place to put random discourses on life
Once more on abortion....
Published on February 12, 2005 By
lifehappens
In
Current Events
This article
Link
brought to mind an article I wrote before about abortion.
When does a baby deserve the right to live? 40 weeks gestation? What if they can be considered "viable" and have a chance for survival at say...26 weeks?
I still don't think that anything could personnally make me want to get an abortion myself. I waited, miserable with fear that I couldn't have children, for nearly 3 years before I had my first child. But, I've never been pregnant after a rape.... I can empathize with the mental anguish that a woman could go through. I'd never begrudge her the choice. I'd never refuse a woman's right to choose. I don't know what they are going through. I don't want to quibble over...well, IF she had a terminal disease or IF she was going to die because of complications AND she had other kids to care for.....That just opens the door for legislation that would allow one woman in desperation the option and not another who is not "enough" at risk.
That being said. I disagree with abortion. I think it is
horrible and wrong
. I think that using
abortion as birth control is heinous
. i think it shows a disregard for the gift of life. A gift from God. Even if you disagree with the religious aspect....it is still destroying a child. Argue definitions and semantics all you want, but if children can survive at 26 weeks or less....(earliest birth that survived was 20 weeks-so far) I have to say that abortion should not be allowed after that point. Because at that point....there is no way of denying that it's destroying a life.
Now that I have pissed off the pro-choice and the right to live crowds, let me back up and point something out. I think abortion at any point is wrong, but if I had an ectopic pregnancy, I'd end it. Technically, it's still a life, but there is no way I could carry that baby far enough through pregnancy for either of us to survive..So I have to allow for the option to choose.
I also believe strongly in free choice. God gave us the unaliable right to choose. Even if someone holds a gun to your head, you still have that right. No one can take it away. I believe that a choice to end another's life is between you and God. I'd kill you to protect my kids. And that choice would be made between me and God. i'd take the consequenses, but that choice is mine. So as distasteful and vile as abortion is....I have to allow others a choice. They are the ones who will be held accountable.
So where does that leave me? I support teaching children about abortion...teaching that it is a last resort, for extreme situations, not birth control. Teaching abstinance. (yes I know kids drink/have sex etc but ENCOURAGING IT IS WRONG) Giving our tax money to support programs that offset costs of adoption and promote monogamous lifestyles instead of abortion clinics. Private dollars can support women's birth control abortions. If someone is desperate, they will find a way get or borrow the money....but I'm not in favor of passing my tax dollars out for repeat offenders.....
Popular Articles in this Category
A day in the Life of Oddities...
Popular Articles from lifehappens
Cuddles, Sex and a Rocking Horse
Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages
1
2
Next
1
Hyperborean Wanderer
on Feb 12, 2005
I agree. It's wrong to do it, and to promote it, but it would also be wrong to make it illegal. Hard choices.
2
dharmagrl
on Feb 12, 2005
I'm with you. I want women to have the right to choose, but at the same time I don't agree with it.
I'm not a christian, as you know, but I do believe that things are given to us when we need them...and that everything happens for a reason. We may not know what the reason is right away, but we will eventually learn it. Aborting a baby for purely self centered reason is like messing with the way of the universe (IMO)...you're asking for trouble when you start tampering with it.
3
Moderateman
on Feb 12, 2005
hence the "moderate" part of my name.... I hate and detest abortion..... but I think it's a womans RIGHT to choose, and I support that right.
4
Gideon MacLeish
on Feb 12, 2005
Life,
Wonderful post. I think you'll find there are more of us that agree with you than you know.
5
AngelaMarie88
on Feb 12, 2005
I hate to sound so brainwashed, but I've really thought the issue out carefully in addition to the Church's stance on abortion.
It really makes sense to me that abortion is completely wrong "except in the rare cases where, in the opinion of competent medical counsel, the life or good health of the mother is seriously endangered or where the pregnancy was caused by rape [or incest] and produces serious emotional trauma in the mother. Even then it should be done only after counseling with the local presiding priesthood authority and after receiving divine confirmation through prayer." Harold B. Lee, N. Eldon Tanner, and Marion G. Romney, “Policies and Procedures,” New Era, Apr. 1973, 29
And I applaud you for using your own words to state essentially the same thing. Conversely, I love your brashness at saying, "I'd kill you to protect my kids." That rings frightfully true to any mother.
Isn't it funny how "in the world" there are only three ways to take a stance on the issue: Pro-Life, Pro-Choice, or completely Pro-Abortion? (I've never known anyone to take the latter stance, butcha never know some sicko's out there.) The Church puts it into a whole new light. Pro-Love & Pro-You'reNotInChargeGodIs.
6
ParaTed2k
on Feb 12, 2005
Great Article!!!
What we need to do first is do away with whole "viability" paradigm. All it does is allows us to define "life", "human being" and "homo sapien" based on political, instead of biological terms.
Once we get passed political definitions and worse yet, "buzzwords", only then can we have legitimate discussions about when one human being can end the life of another.
7
Texas Wahine
on Feb 12, 2005
Awesome article, life.
8
Dysmas
on Feb 12, 2005
Good article and good points.
Umm.......which Church would that be exactly?
9
lifehappens
on Feb 13, 2005
Angela is quoting some leaders from the LDS (mormon) church.
10
Pantherchic
on Feb 13, 2005
I think using abortion as birth control is wrong. I knew a woman that did. Instead of spending the $20 or $30 a month for birth control this woman would just go get an abortion. I do not support that. I am pro-choice. Not pro-abuse.
11
bakerstreet
on Feb 13, 2005
My only thought is this. Outside life/death situations, is there ever a need to kill an unborn child when people literally wait years to adopt a baby? In terms of finances and healthcare, there are options there. There are services available, both private and public, for women who need help.
As for choice, I don't want to start conflicts in what seems to be (for once) a civil conversation on the subject. I'll just say that the discussion in our society is more often about streamlining, sanitizing, and desensitizing, rather than "choice".
Someone here admitted to me once that they believed a child, found to be mentally handicapped pre-natally, should be aborted. Others have said that women who find themselves pregnant without the financial ability to support a child should "do the responsible thing" and abort it.
"Choice" seems to be a slippery slope.
12
lifehappens
on Feb 13, 2005
Outside life/death situations, is there ever a need to kill an unborn child when people literally wait years to adopt a baby?
Personnally, I don't think so. I cried every month for years when I wasn't pregnant. It took us 3 years to have our first child. Every person who considered an abortion for "birth control" was throwing away the one thing I wanted and couldn't have.....
"Choice" seems to be a slippery slope.
Yes....but at what point do we take away the choice?
13
bakerstreet
on Feb 13, 2005
"Yes....but at what point do we take away the choice?"
That's the point where "I don't want to start conflicts in what seems to be (for once) a civil conversation on the subject."
14
Dysmas
on Feb 13, 2005
Thank you very much!
God bless
15
lifehappens
on Feb 16, 2005
"Yes....but at what point do we take away the choice?"That's the point where "I don't want to start conflicts in what seems to be (for once) a civil conversation on the subject."
It was more of a hypothetical/personal question to ponder...there is no clear answer to that one. And I want to thank all those out there who manage to stay so civilized on my blog....It makes me so happy not to have a crazy, mean fight going on......
2 Pages
1
2
Next
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums.
Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
It's simple, and FREE!
Sign Up Now!
Meta
Views
» 1842
Comments
»
18
Category
»
Current Events
Comment
Recent Article Comments
LightStar Design Windowblind...
Let's start a New Jammin Thr...
Modding Ara: History Untold
DeskScapes 11: The Dream Mak...
Which A.I. Software Are You ...
ChatGPT 4o vs. o1 vs. o1 Pro...
What's the Last Book You Rea...
A day in the Life of Odditie...
Let's see your political mem...
Safe and free software downl...
Sponsored Links